and, and, and ...
re. the interview: would potentially be interesting to have separate sentences, stanzas of arguments, deductions and reasons recorded for transcription and use on labels [box photographs and ... (value) maps] Peter's talk about the 'pointless' object (making it non-pointless by default), being a case in point?
we should do this more often, you know! I'll bring the mini-disc tomorrow.
we should do this more often, you know! I'll bring the mini-disc tomorrow.
posted by marianne at 9:01 pm
4 Comments:
Pointless objects....sounds good
I have just found this blog.
have terrible confession to make - tape did not come out of the interview I did with you both am revealed as crap academic who cannot make technology work....
You found us! welcome!
It was never meant to be a secret. we're testing the blog as a collective research tool and sketchbook. So far, feel I need to be more consistent to make it work properly + still don't know how to doodle electronically.
Nobody knows how to make technology work consistently, I think. Perhaps our conversation was not meant to be fixed?
Actually I like things not being fixed too.
Writing up the interview was interesting as what I remembered became the focal point....
perhaps writing up about what you remember of museums is a trace of the museum.
at least a trace of the memory of a museum - same thing? what is interesting is why two traces are never the same. and more interesting, how, when traces converge or cross for a moment they allow you to see -- or remember -- what you forgot!
Post a Comment
<< Home